genme ([info]genme) wrote,
@ 2006-05-05 09:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
My Super Sweet 16
Ana Marie Cox (aka the Wonkette, aka someone who I should have known at U of Chicago but somehow didn't) recently wrote a column in Time magazine about the MTV show "My Super Sweet 16." If you have not had the nauseating pleasure, this is a show about very rich, very spoiled kids whose parents spend half a million dollars on their birthday parties. When I mention it in the book, I point out that the irony of rich kids whining is likely to slip past the typical 15-year-old watching the show. Sure enough, one of my undergrads tells me her sister was disappointed with her perfectly nice 16th birthday party because it did not approach the excesses of this show. All I could do is shake my head.

At any rate, Cox's column focuses on how these youngsters want to be like celebrities. A few lines from the column: "Their blingy flings are not celebrations of accomplishment; they're celebrations of self." "Each guest of honor is really after only one thing: 'I feel famous. I love it,' says one." "Far from joining polite society like the debutates of the past, the kids gleefully rip through social graces, alienating friends and sacrificing tact."

I love pop culture analyses like this, but it's even more interesting to take it a little deeper: *Why* do these teens act this way? I'm sure there are multiple causes. At least one is the underlying psychology I lay out in _Generation Me_: the ever-present emphasis on the self that often crosses over into narcissism. The obsession with becoming famous or acting like a celebrity plays right into that -- the need for recognition is a subscale on the narcissism inventory (Items: "I wish someone would someday write my biography"," "I like to be the center of attention.")

Other possibilities -- Is American society more materialistic now than it was, say, 30 years ago? Or is it something else?


(Post a new comment)


[info]sanpaku
2006-05-05 05:15 pm UTC (link)
You left the Maroon before she started in the Arts section (what was it called again?). I think she was co-editor with Andrew Gross our senior year. Another one for the "people I knew who made it instead of me" file. She's OK.

People act this way because MTV came to ask them to act this way. And they have spent 15 years watching so-called "reality television" of people acting badly in front of the camera. The show sounds horrible but no more so than, say, Morton Downey Jr. Fads come and go. I think the horrible behavior on television fad will pass as well.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]genme
2006-05-05 08:43 pm UTC (link)
Well, I was still with the Maroon senior year -- but I guess I just wrote my column. My days of hanging around the office were definitely past by then.

Hmm, but presumably they were going to have a big expensive party even before MTV rang them up. The talk show bad behavior can be written off to the camera -- as can some of the bad behavior of the teens on this show. But you can't help but think they were whiny even before the camera was turned on. Though your point is well-taken: these teens want to be famous. That's why they agreed to be on TV in the first place. Somehow I think that decades ago there weren't as many people who would have liked to have their lives filmed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sanpaku
2006-05-05 09:10 pm UTC (link)
Well, also, read about some of the "society balls" given by the wealthy in the Gilded Age. We're definitely headed back to another Gilded Age, if we're not there already. It's just status. There have always been stupid things for rich people to waste their money on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]genme
2006-05-05 10:19 pm UTC (link)
But didn't the young ladies at those balls behave themselves? Debutante balls, in particular, were held to celebrate the fact that the young women had learned the social graces and were ready to enter civilized society. They actually bowed low to show respect for society. I can't see the MTV teens doing that in a million years. They want everyone to bow to *them*.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sanpaku
2006-05-07 01:00 am UTC (link)
Yes, a festival of restraint, as it were. But don't discount rich people eating lobsters off of gold plates and smoking $100 bills. Within the restraint, an orgy of ostentatious consumption. There's nothing new under the sun, even if the overt message being sent might be different.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]varro
2006-05-05 09:21 pm UTC (link)
I do remember her on the Maroon, but not very well, when you were Senior News Editor and I was News Editor. More like "I know the name, but not the face..."

Of course, my wife and I tried to low-key our wedding as well as we could, by having it in Vegas at the county office building, and keeping my dad out of it until about 3 weeks before, because he would have made things much more complicated. Something like that show would have horrified either one of us...

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…